Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Formula Comparison 2019

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    11,423
    Thanked: 12751

    Default Formula Comparison 2019

    I continue to study the 2019 Esbilac problems.
    During those studies I have found some interesting data that I am going to share. The first is a comparison of different formula based on Metabolizable Energy (ME). This is the definition of Metabolizable Energy.

    Name:  6836FC45-1886-496B-A739-AA7AEF791DAB.jpg
Views: 158
Size:  52.4 KB

    This is a spread sheet of different formula based on the kcal/kg.
    Some of these formula we use and some that we should never use but I have included them as a comparison.

    Name:  3D9AF33E-B701-4DE6-9E3D-3F66E2B8D623.png
Views: 150
Size:  13.9 KB

    While this data does not explain the 2019 issues with Esbilac, it does point out just how deficient Esbilac is compared to other wildlife formula or even a higher quality puppy formula. I’m actually surprised that Esbilac has worked so well for us in the past. I think Esbilac sits on a ‘delicate edge’ between success and failure and even a small nutritional anomaly sends it crashing into the abyss of failure. Don’t get me wrong, whatever is ‘wrong’ with Esbilac 2019 is major but I personally think it takes less than we think to make it fail.

  2. 8 TSBers pass along the fuzzy thanks to HRT4SQRLS:

    Grinderhead (11-08-2019), gunpackingrandma (11-09-2019), lukaslolamaus (11-08-2019), Mel1959 (11-08-2019), Nancy in New York (11-08-2019), RockyPops (11-08-2019), stepnstone (11-08-2019), TubeDriver (11-08-2019)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •