This is my concern that I posted earlier. Is there some good evidence that it's the formula? How many people have used these lot numbers and filed complaints somewhere? Sometimes things can snowball.What exactly were the symptoms again--"sticky" poop? Did X number of people report the exact same symptoms independently/without influence from each other and in different places? Or did perhaps one person have issues with babies, determined (righlty or wrongly) it was the formula, and others who had issues with babies jumped on the bandwagon? Have people used lot numbers other than those two and chimed in that their babies are doing okay? How many people SPECIFIED those two lot numbers and not just Esbilac?Originally Posted by lizharrell1
Another concern is that, if the problem is legitimate, and as the company reportedly said there's been no change in the formula, only the way it's processed, I would imagine ANY powdered Esbilac purchased that was produced after those lot numbers would have the same problems with it.
This is all very frustrating to me. Every time I try to find "the best" formula to use, I get equally adamant arguments on all sides. Anne, why not Esbilac? What problems? SR&BT I thought was going to call the ASPCA on me for using Fox Valley (by the way, clean out your mailbox SR&BT). I've all but switched from FV to Esbilac for the littlest ones, and now I'm wondering if I did the right thiing---aaarrrrrggghhh!